malik: Won’t touch upon Sameer Wankhede, household until December 9: Nawab Malik assures Bombay HC | India News

NEW DELHI: Maharashtra minister and NCP chief Nawab Malik on Thursday assured the Bombay High Court that he won’t publish any tweets or make any public remark in opposition to NCB’s zonal director Sameer Wankhede, his father or any of their members of the family until December 9, the following date of listening to.
The assertion got here after the excessive court docket requested the minister whether or not he has lodged a criticism with the caste scrutiny committee relating to his allegations in opposition to Sameer Wankhede’s caste credentials.
The court docket additional mentioned if he has not executed so what was his intention behind the “media publicity”, which it mentioned doesn’t befit a minister.
The assertion on Malik’s behalf was made by his counsel Karl Tamboly earlier than a bench of Justices S J Kathawalla and Milind Jadhav after it mentioned that it was inclined to cross an order restraining the minister from making public feedback in opposition to the Wankhedes until additional listening to.
The bench mentioned that it was obvious that Malik’s tweets had stemmed out of malice.
“Why is the minister behaving like this? Why ought to he behave like this we wish to know? This is nothing however malice. Please learn the dictionary which means of malice,” the HC mentioned.
The bench was listening to an enchantment filed by Dnyandev Wankhede, father of Sameer Wankhede, difficult the order of a single bench of the excessive court docket that had refused on November 22, to restrain Malik from making defamatory statements in opposition to him and his household.
Senior counsel Birendra Saraf, who appeared on behalf of Dnyandev earlier than the bench led by Justice Kathawalla, submitted that the one bench had recorded in its order that Malik had made allegations in opposition to Sameer Wankhede pertaining to his faith, and his having acquired unlawful gratification whereas on responsibility, with out due verification.
“The findings of the one bench are that the tweets (by Malik) had actuated out of malice and animosity and but, no reduction was granted to me (Dnyandev),” Saraf mentioned.
“The single choose says that he (Malik) disregarded the reality, and that the paperwork he submitted in court docket had been both interpolated or not verified,” he mentioned.
Saraf additional mentioned that the minister had made feedback not simply in opposition to Dnyandev and Sameer Wankhede, however in opposition to their different members of the family too.
“He (Malik) has spared nobody…my daughter, my lifeless spouse. This morning, too, he has tweeted,” Saraf mentioned referring to a tweet made by the minister on Thursday morning, whereby he posted a picture of a doc that he known as pertained to the final rites of Dnyandev’s spouse and confirmed her faith as Muslim.
Saraf additional mentioned that Malik had submitted paperwork in court docket informal with out verification.
Tamboly, nevertheless, mentioned that the NCP chief had submitted verified paperwork earlier than the one bench on affidavit to show a number of allegations made in opposition to the Wankhedes, together with the declare that Sameer Wankhede, although born a Muslim had falsely claimed in his caste certificates to belong to a chosen Scheduled Caste (SC) class to safe his central authorities job.
At this, the bench requested if Malik had made any formal criticism earlier than the caste scrutiny committee.
When Tamboly mentioned no such criticism had been made but, the bench requested why Malik was then making such public statements?
“Any criticism made to the caste scrutiny committee? If no then what’s he making an attempt to show? Is this for media publicity? For claims of caste falsities, everybody has a redressal discussion board (the caste scrutiny committee),” the excessive court docket mentioned.
“If there’s a caste certificates in his (Malik’s) favor, then as a substitute of all this media publicity that he desires on a regular basis, particularly after his son-in-law was arrested by wankhede, why not strategy the committee?…He is a minister…does it befit him to do all this?” the bench requested.
The court docket additional mentioned that if it was apparent that Malik’s tweets had actuated out of malice, and the identical had been recorded as a categorical discovering of the one bench, then what should logically comply with was that the minister be restrained from making additional feedback till Dnyandev Wankhede’s enchantment was heard lastly by the court docket.
Tamboly then sought time to take directions.
He mentioned that Malik’s daughter-in-law was current in court docket and that they has determined that “as a substitute of moving into an issue, I (Malik) won’t tweet or say something till the ultimate listening to”.
The excessive court docket accepted Tamboly’s assertion, however requested why was the minister’s daughter-in-law current within the court docket room when she was not a celebration to the case.
“Is the minister’s entire household concerned on this? Why is she right here?” the HC requested.
It, nevertheless, took on document Tamboly’s assertion that “no tweets and public statements shall be made in opposition to the plaintiff (Dnyandev Wankhede) and his members of the family by means of any technique of publicity, whether or not instantly or not directly” till December 9, the following date of listening to.
(With inputs from PTI)

Source link